Can Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Promote Neurogenesis and Axonogenesis in Subacute Human Ischemic Stroke?

BACKGROUND: Ischemic stroke may trigger neuroplastic changes via proliferation, migration towards the lesion, and differentiation of neuroprogenitor cells into mature neurons. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) may promote brain plasticity. This study aimed to assess rTMS's effect on post-stroke endogenous neuroplasticity by dosing plasma miRs 17~92, Netrin-1, Sema3A, and BDNF. METHODS: In this case-controlled study, we randomized 19 ischemic stroke patients within five days from symptoms onset (T0) to neuronavigated-rTMS or sham stimulation. Stimulation was applied on the stroke hemisphere daily between the 7th and 14th day from stroke onset. Blood samples were collected at T0, before the first rTMS section (T7), and at the end of the last rTMS session (T14). Five healthy controls were also enrolled in this study. RESULTS: Of 19 patients, 10 received rTMS and 9 sham stimulation. Compared with the sham group, in the rTMS group, plasma levels of miRs17~92 and Ntn-1 significantly increased whereas Sema3A levels tended to decrease. In multivariate linear regression analyses, rTMS was independently related to Ntn-1 and miR-25 levels at T14. CONCLUSIONS: We found an association between rTMS and neurogenesis/axonogenesis biomarker enhancement. Our preliminary data suggest that rTMS may positively interfere with natural endogenous plasticity phenomena of the post-ischemic human brain.

No-reflow phenomenon in acute ischemic stroke: an angiographic evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Futile recanalization (FR) is de fined as a poor 90-day outcome or lack of neurological improvement at 24 h despite successful recanalization in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO) treated by mechanical throbectomy (MT). The No-reflow phenomenon (NRP) could be a possible cause of FR, but its evidence in AIS patients is scarce. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 185 digital subtraction angiographies (DSA) of AIS patients with anterior circulation LVO after endovascular treatment. To better define NRP, we designed a score called the modified capillary index score (mCIS). The score is obtained by dividing the middle cerebral artery territory in three segments. For each segment, we gave 2 points if the capillary blush was present without any delay, 1 if delayed, and 0 if absent. The primary endpoint was to use mCIS to identify NRP on post-interventional DSA and to test whether this marker may predict FR and failure of early neurological improvement (fENI). The secondary endpoint was to search for a correlation between NRP, lesion volume, and hemorrhagic transformation. We used the ROC curve to define mCIS ≤ 3 as the cut-off and marker of NRP. RESULTS: NRP was present in 35.1% of patients. NRP predicted fENI at 24 h (aOR 2.825, 95% CI 1.265-6.308, P = 0.011) and at 7 days (aOR 2.191, 95% CI 1.008-4.762, P = 0.048), but not 90-day FR. Moreover, NRP predicted hemorrhagic transformation (aOR 2.444, 95% CI 1.266-4.717, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The modified capillary index score (mCIS) seems useful in identifying NRP in AIS. In addition, mCIS was able to predict NRP that correlated with early clinical outcome and hemorrhagic transformation of the ischemic lesion. An external validation of the score is warranted.

A transient magnetic resonance spectroscopy peri-ischemic peak: a possible radiological biomarker of post-stroke neurogenesis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In adult human brain, neurogenesis seems to persist throughout life and ischemic stroke was proved to stimulate this process. Using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), a 1.28-ppm peak, putative biomarker of neural progenitor cells (NPCs), was identified both in vitro and in vivo, i.e., in normal rat and healthy human brain. The aim of our study was to identify a 1.28-ppm peak in adult human ischemic brain by using 3.0 T multivoxel MRS. METHODS: We studied 10 patients, six males, and four females, with a mean (± SD) age of 59.3 (± 17.3), at three different time points from ischemic stroke onset (T0: < 5 days; T14: 14 ± 2 days; T30: 30 ± 2 days). RESULTS: In all patients except one, a 1.28-ppm peak at T14 was detected at the ischemic boundary (all p values < 0.05). MRS performed on six voluntary age-matched healthy subjects did not detect any 1.28-ppm peak. CONCLUSIONS: The nature of this 1.28-pm peak is uncertain; however, our data support the hypothesis that it might represent a marker of NPCs in post-stroke human brain.

Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein on retrieved thrombi from COVID-19 patients.

The pathophysiology of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy is complex and not fully understood. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (SP) may activate platelets and interact with fibrin(ogen). We aimed to investigate whether isolated SP can be present in clots retrieved in COVID-19 patients with acute ischemic stroke (by mechanical thrombectomy) and myocardial infarction. In this pilot study, we could detect SP, but not nucleocapsid protein, on platelets of COVID-19 patients' thrombi. In addition, in all three COVID-19 thrombi analyzed for molecular biology, no SARS-CoV-2 RNA could be detected by real-time polymerase chain reaction. These data could support the hypothesis that free SP, besides the whole virus, may be the trigger of platelet activation and clot formation in COVID-19.

Cerebrovascular Complications of COVID-19 and COVID-19 Vaccination.

The risk of stroke and cerebrovascular disease complicating infection with SARS-CoV-2 has been extensively reported since the onset of the pandemic. The striking efforts of many scientists in cooperation with regulators and governments worldwide have rapidly brought the development of a large landscape of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. The novel DNA and mRNA vaccines have offered great flexibility in terms of antigen production and led to an unprecedented rapidity in effective and safe vaccine production. However, as mass vaccination has progressed, rare but catastrophic cases of thrombosis have occurred in association with thrombocytopenia and antibodies against PF4 (platelet factor 4). This catastrophic syndrome has been named vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Rarely, ischemic stroke can be the symptom onset of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia or can complicate the course of the disease. In this review, we provide an overview of stroke and cerebrovascular disease as a complication of the SARS-CoV-2 infection and outline the main clinical and radiological characteristics of cerebrovascular complications of vaccinations, with a focus on vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Based on the available data from the literature and from our experience, we propose a therapeutic protocol to manage this challenging condition. Finally, we highlight the overlapping pathophysiologic mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination leading to thrombosis.

SARS-CoV-2 infection predicts larger infarct volume in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Background and purpose: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a fearful complication of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19). Aims of this study were to compare clinical/radiological characteristics, endothelial and coagulation dysfunction between acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with and without COVID-19 and to investigate if and how the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (SP) was implicated in triggering platelet activation. Methods: We enrolled AIS patients with COVID-19 within 12 h from onset and compared them with an age- and sex-matched cohort of AIS controls without COVID-19. Neuroimaging studies were performed within 24 h. Blood samples were collected in a subset of 10 patients. Results: Of 39 AIS patients, 22 had COVID-19 and 17 did not. Admission levels of Factor VIII and von Willebrand factor antigen were significantly higher in COVID-19 patients and positively correlated with the infarct volume. In multivariate linear regression analyses, COVID-19 was an independent predictor of infarct volume (B 20.318, Beta 0.576, 95%CI 6.077-34.559; p = 0.011). SP was found in serum of 2 of the 10 examined COVID-19 patients. Platelets from healthy donors showed a similar degree of procoagulant activation induced by COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients' sera. The anti-SP and anti-FcγRIIA blocking antibodies had no effect in modulating platelet activity in both groups. Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 infection seems to play a major role in endothelium activation and infarct volume extension during AIS.